Can you use Node JS as a backend instead of Laravel?

Comments Off on Can you use Node JS as a backend instead of Laravel?

Is Node JS an efficient alternative to Laravel for backend development? Can it effectively cater to the dynamic needs of a versatile application? Or would Laravel still have an edge over it? These questions often buzz around when decision-makers are considering the best technology to use for their backend development. Being two popular choices, Node JS and Laravel each carry their own strengths and potential issues.

According to Stack Overflow’s 2020 Developer Survey, Node JS emerges as the most popular technology in the ‘Other Frameworks, Libraries, and Tools’ category. Despite Laravel’s reputation for simplifying complex coding tasks, several developers have expressed concerns on forums like GitHub, Reddit, etc., regarding Laravel’s steep learning curve and slower performance in handling large scale applications. The frustration deepens when developers have to maintain an application throughout its lifecycle, requiring frequent modifications based on changing business requirements.
The solution? A shift to Node JS—reputed for faster execution, simpler language construct, and flexibility in dealing with changes.

In this article, you will learn the ins and outs of using Node JS as a backend, especially in comparison with Laravel. It will shed light on the key challenges you may encounter while transitioning to Node JS from Laravel, the learning curve, process optimizations, and ways to make your application more scalable and adaptable with Node JS.

This article will also provide a detailed comparative analysis of Node JS and Laravel, enumerate the potential situations where one might be more beneficial than the other, and assist you to take an informed decision on the backend technology, relevant to your application’s needs and future plans.

Essential Definitions: Node JS and Laravel as Backends

Node JS and Laravel are platforms used for backend development in web applications. The backend is the server side of any application and handles functions like data management, computation and performs the essential operations. Node JS, built on Chrome’s JavaScript runtime, is used for creating scalable network applications. It uses non-blocking, event-driven I/O model, which makes it lightweight and efficient, perfectly suited for data-intensive real-time applications.

Laravel, on the other hand, is a PHP framework used in web application development. It’s known for elegant syntax and empowering developers by making tasks like routing, sessions and caching easier. Laravel tackles many challenges presented in the web development process, thereby simplifying the task for developers.

I. Exploring Node JS: An Unexpected power-player in Backend Development

Superior Flexibility and Performance with Node JS

Developers and enterprises are increasingly choosing Node JS as the backbone of their web applications’ backend. This shift is motivated largely by Node JS’s superior flexibility and performance. Unlike Laravel, a PHP framework that is traditionally more monolithic and server-side, Node JS is lightweight, efficient, and decidedly modern.

Built on Chrome’s V8 JavaScript Engine, Node JS allows you to build high-performance network applications. It benefits from a non-blocking, event-driven architecture that makes it ideal for real-time applications such as gaming and chat applications. This same architecture also allows Node JS to handle thousands of concurrent connections with minimal overhead, a feat Laravel struggles with.

Node JS’s Developer-Friendly Ecosystem

Another significant advantage of Node JS over Laravel is its developer-friendly ecosystem. Node JS boasts an extensive package library, npm, with over 800,000 building blocks, known as packages, which developers can utilize to fast-track application building. The npm registry is an open-source database of reusable parts that allow developers to assemble software much like building blocks.

The following are a few key components of Node.js’s ecosystem:

  • Express.js: A minimal and flexible Node.js web application framework. It provides a robust set of features for web and mobile applications.
  • Socket.IO: This library allows bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.
  • Bluebird: A fully-featured promise library with focus on innovative features and performance.

Although Laravel also comes with built-in tools and integrations, they are arguably less flexible and more complex to use. With Node JS, however, developers have more control over how they build their applications.

Increased control, developer-friendly tools, fast performance, and a robust ecosystem are just a few reasons why many are making the switch from Laravel to Node JS. It represents a potent mix of control and simplicity in one package, making it a powerful alternative for backend development.

II. Leveraging Node JS: Setting the Stage for Advanced Backend Capabilities

Thought-Provoking Question: Is Node JS More Efficient Than Laravel?

When it comes to web development, your choice of backend can significantly impact the overall performance of your application. Could Node.js be a better option than Laravel? To understand this more, let’s compare the two. Laravel is a PHP framework which focuses on a developer-friendly environment, offering a clean, elegant syntax. But Laravel could be considered slower when it comes to handling multiple requests concurrently. On the other hand, Node.js, a runtime built on JavaScript, is renowned for its ability to handle numerous client requests simultaneously, making it an ideal choice for real-time applications. Moreover, Node.js can aid developers in writing server-side scripts using JavaScript, thereby synchronising the frontend and backend language, resulting in cleaner and more manageable code.

The Main Challenge: Performance Bottlenecks with Laravel

Unlike Node JS, Laravel’s main issue lies in its synchronous, blocking architecture, which can frequently lead to performance bottlenecks especially in applications which deal with massive requests concurrently. This is because, being synchronously designed, Laravel processes requests one after the other–it won’t move on to the next request until the previous one completes, leading to potential delays. For applications with lighter loads or lesser concurrency, Laravel might still be able to perform competently. However, as the application grows and manages more data and users, these little lag times can accumulate, adversely affecting the performance. It is in this exact situation where Node.js shines, with its asynchronous non-blocking I/O, allowing applications to maintain high performance even under heavy loads.

Best Practices: Implementing Node.js for Real-Time Applications

Take for instance a real-time voting application, where thousands of votes are transmitted and processed per second – Node.js is well-equipped to handle this as its asynchronous structure can process votes as soon as they are received, ensuring no delays and real-time updates. Twitter is another excellent example of Node.js application. With millions of tweets, retweets, and likes processed per minute, Node.js’s event-driven programming ensures immediate data processing, offering users a fluid, seamless experience. Using such well-known platforms as examples, we see a clear pattern – high performing, scalable applications tend to sway toward Node.js for their backend due to its asynchronous, non-blocking architecture. Echoing these practices when developing and scaling your own real-time, high-load applications can significantly increase your application’s performance and user experience.

III. Escaping Laravel’s Shadow: Unveiling the Efficiency of Node JS Backend

Why Consider Node JS for Backend Development?

Have you ever wondered why many emerging tech giants are choosing Node JS over Laravel for their backend development? The primary key is in its efficiency and scalability. Node JS, based on JavaScript, makes it easy for developers to write server-side applications. With JavaScript already dominating the frontend, the ability of Node JS to unify web application development around a single programming language reduces context-switching and thereby enhances productivity.

Unlike Laravel, which is a framework of PHP, Node JS is a runtime environment. It’s not language-specific like Laravel. So, you can run JavaScript locally on your machine as you would in a browser, something PHP can’t do. Node JS’s asynchronicity is fitting for dealing with multiple requests concurrently, a frequent challenge posed by modern, interactive websites that Laravel may struggle with due to its synchronous nature.

Troubles with Traditional Laravel Backend

Turning our focus to the issues many face when using Laravel for backend development, we find that Node JS has been designed to overcome these. The synchronous model of Laravel can lead to delay and inefficiency as the system waits for tasks to complete before proceeding. In the world of web applications where hundreds of tasks might be happening simultaneously, this is hardly optimal.

Laravel is also heavily dependent on server resources, making it sometimes unsuitable for shared hosting environments due to its hefty memory usage. Furthermore, being language-specific, Laravel can pose a hurdle for developers not familiar with PHP. It could require learning a new language in a short period, which might lead to a failure in delivering rapid solutions.

Embracing Node JS, A Paradigm Shift

By choosing Node JS for your backend development, you’ll be powering your project with the technology adopted by industry giants like Netflix, LinkedIn, and eBay. For instance, by implementing Node JS, LinkedIn increased their Mobile App’s performance by 20 times while reducing the number of servers from 30 to 3. Such examples epitomize the efficiency of Node JS.

Netflix, on the other hand, leveraged the lightweight nature of Node JS, which led to a drastic reduction in startup time, from 40 minutes to under a minute. These examples provide the testament to the superiority of Node JS in terms of efficiency, speed, and performance, making it a compelling alternative over Laravel for backend development. From the start, it’s important to choose a scalable and flexible solution to avoid possible issues in the long run, underlining a case for Node JS.


Isn’t it fascinating how the technological world keeps evolving and offering us various options to delve into? Both Node JS and Laravel are competent, serving as backends in their own unique ways. They both step into the field with their strengths and uniqueness. While Laravel, a PHP framework, is predominantly known for its elegant syntax and MVC architectural pattern, Node JS, on the other hand, is highly appreciated for its non-blocking, event-driven architecture and the speed it provides. Therefore, yes, you can absolutely use Node JS as a backend instead of Laravel. It ultimately boils down to your project requirements, scope, and your team’s expertise and preference in deciding upon the technology you intend to choose.

With every piece that we share, we hope to engage, enlighten, and trigger critical thinking among our tech-savy readers. It’s because of your consistent readership, constructive suggestions, and unyielding support that we continue to explore new dimensions in technology. Our endeavor always remains to keep you updated on the latest trends, technologies, and debates shifting the world of web development. Hence, we humbly request you to follow our blog, ensuring that you never miss out on such insightful pieces. And remember, there’s always something interesting brewing in the world of technology that we’ll be serving up for you soon.

We know how exciting the anticipation of new releases can be, which is why we constantly strive to provide up-to-date information. We assure you that waiting for our next release is entirely worthwhile. We will be getting right back on track, diving deep into technological discussions, and providing opinions that could potentially shift your perspective. We are committed to enriching your knowledge palette with various thoughts on technology, understanding the essence of different frameworks, languages, and much more. So, stay tuned, and brace yourself for an enthralling tech journey that awaits you.


1. Can Node.js be used as a backend alternative to Laravel?
Yes, Node.js can certainly be used as a backend alternative to Laravel. While Laravel is a PHP-based framework, Node.js is a JavaScript runtime that allows you to run javascript on the server side, making it a viable alternative for backend development.

2. What are some prominent features of Node.js that make it suitable for backend development?
Node.js is especially known for its excellent performance and scalability. It’s built upon Google’s V8 JavaScript engine, which improves its runtime efficiency and non-blocking I/O model, allowing it to handle numerous requests concurrently.

3. Does the shift from Laravel to Node.js require any special preparation?
Shifting from Laravel to Node.js would require some preparation, mainly centered around learning javascript if your team primarily works with PHP. It’s also crucial to understand the event-driven, non-blocking nature of Node.js which is a departure from traditional PHP synchronous style.

4. Are there any specific use-cases where Node.js performs better than Laravel?
Node.js stands out in its ability to handle real-time applications like chatbots, gaming servers, collaboration tools, or anything requiring high IO-bound operations. It is also ideal when working with JSON APIs, single-page applications, and data-driven applications.

5. What is better for my project – using Laravel or Node.js?
The selection between Laravel and Node.js entirely depends on your project requirements and the programming skills of your team. If your application requires handling intensive I/O operations and real-time functionality, Node.js would be a great choice. However, for simpler applications, Laravel might be more preferable thanks to its robust and comprehensive ecosystem.